Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36
Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 is located in northwest Illinois. Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 has 7.09 square miles of land area and 0.31 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 population is 1,812. Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 median household income is $32,273 in 2010-2014. Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 median house value is $96,300 in 2010-2014. On average, Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 309 | 273 | 232 | 287 | 286 | 280 | 269 |
English Language Learner Students: | NA | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Total Teachers: | 26.00 | NA | 22.34 | 24.01 | 23.62 | 22.50 | 17.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 2.02 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary: | 25.00 | NA | 20.34 | 21.39 | 20.34 | 19.50 | 8.70 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 6.30 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 5.00 | 9.96 | 3.00 | 3.09 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 7.50 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 4.08 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 2.80 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 1.00 | 3.08 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.50 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 11.88 | NA | 10.39 | 11.95 | 12.11 | 12.44 | 15.82 |
Schools
Eagle Ridge School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 2002 Eagle Ridge Dr, Silvis IL 61282 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.4% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 42.0% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 52% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 34.6% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53.4% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 39.3% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.8% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 52% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 41.9% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 60% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 28.1% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.7% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 42.0% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 28.1% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 45.2% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.4% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.7% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 38.2% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 45.9% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.0% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.7% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.9% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 17.6% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.7% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 20.7% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 48.1% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 15.8% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 48.4% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 15.8% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.0% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.0% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 28.6% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 47.7% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 23.0% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 20.0% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 47.8% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 10.0% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $3,667,000 | $15,806 | $3,660,000 | $12,753 | $3,359,000 | $11,745 | |||
Federal: | $416,000 | $1,793 | 11.3% | $570,000 | $1,986 | 15.6% | $785,000 | $2,745 | 23.4% |
State: | $2,281,000 | $9,832 | 62.2% | $2,131,000 | $7,425 | 58.2% | $1,716,000 | $6,000 | 51.1% |
Local: | $970,000 | $4,181 | 26.5% | $959,000 | $3,341 | 26.2% | $858,000 | $3,000 | 25.5% |
Total Expenditures: | $3,582,000 | $15,440 | $3,322,000 | $11,575 | $3,222,000 | $11,266 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $3,122,000 | $13,457 | $3,032,000 | $10,564 | $2,866,000 | $10,021 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,946,000 | $8,388 | 62.3% | $1,963,000 | $6,840 | 64.7% | $1,866,000 | $6,524 | 65.1% |
Student and Staff Support: | $194,000 | $836 | 6.2% | $197,000 | $686 | 6.5% | $141,000 | $493 | 4.9% |
Administration: | $559,000 | $2,409 | 17.9% | $435,000 | $1,516 | 14.3% | $401,000 | $1,402 | 14.0% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $423,000 | $1,823 | 13.5% | $437,000 | $1,523 | 14.4% | $458,000 | $1,601 | 16.0% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $239,000 | $1,030 | $41,000 | $143 | $61,000 | $213 | |||
Construction: | $21,000 | $91 | $8,000 | $28 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $2,000 | $9 | $5,000 | $17 | $7,000 | $24 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $74,000 | $319 | $84,000 | $293 | $93,000 | $325 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,670,000 | $7,198 | $1,704,000 | $5,937 | $1,568,000 | $5,483 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,233,000 | $5,315 | 73.8% | $1,296,000 | $4,516 | 76.1% | $1,201,000 | $4,199 | 76.6% |
Other Salary: | $437,000 | $1,884 | 26.2% | $408,000 | $1,422 | 23.9% | $367,000 | $1,283 | 23.4% |
Total Benefit: | $888,000 | $3,828 | $777,000 | $2,707 | $750,000 | $2,622 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $666,000 | $2,871 | 75.0% | $597,000 | $2,080 | 76.8% | $598,000 | $2,091 | 79.7% |
Other Benefit: | $222,000 | $957 | 25.0% | $180,000 | $627 | 23.2% | $152,000 | $531 | 20.3% |
* Carbon Cliff-Barstow School District 36 was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.